Male Athlete "BPJ" Smokes the Competition at the West Virginia State Track and Field Meet
In January, BPJ's legal team argued in front of the Supreme Court that he always finishes "back of the pack" & just wants to have fun with his friends. The track meet results tell a different story.
This June, the Supreme Court is expected to issue its opinion in West Virginia v. B.P.J., a landmark case challenging the state’s “Save Women’s Sports Act.” The law requires student-athletes to compete on teams consistent with sex, aiming to protect fair competition and opportunities for girls and women in sports.
B.P.J. is a boy who takes puberty blockers and estrogen and wants to compete in the girls’ category.
B.P.J. has been able to compete on girls’ school sports teams in West Virginia despite the state’s ban due to a temporary injunction granted by federal courts. This legal block allowed him to participate while the broader lawsuit over the law’s constitutionality proceeded.
The ACLU, which is representing B.P.J., has portrayed him as a vulnerable “trans girl” who, after puberty blockers and estrogen, is not competitive and simply wants to participate socially with “her female friends” — essentially arguing that excluding her from girls’ teams is unjust discrimination against a sympathetic, non-threatening minor.
The argument that sports are all about inclusion and fun is one I reject. Competitive sports are not about inclusion. They are about exclusion. Some people don’t make the team. Some don’t make the podium. In that process we learn about who we are, what we’re good at, how to pick ourselves up and keep trying. That’s a core value of youth sports. And to be clear, this is a high school team that B.P.J. is on. This isn’t 8-year-old rec league sports.
Also, to be clear, B.P.J. just won state in the shot put.
So much for just having fun with friends.
B.P.J., or Becky Pepper-Jackson, is a biological male who identifies as female and has been competing on girls’ teams in West Virginia, particularly in track and field events like shot put and discus, for several years.
The ACLU’s defense has emphasized B.P.J.’s early social transition (“identifying as” female since third grade), medical interventions to block male puberty and the emotional harm of exclusion. Lawyers argued B.P.J. was “back of the pack” in competitions, framing the issue around inclusion, mental health, and Title IX/Equal Protection claims rather than any meaningful athletic advantage.
The irony with this argument of Equal Protection, of course (and I’m no lawyer), is that allowing B.P.J. to compete in the girls’ category and enter the girls’ locker room, denies girls equal protection. At least it seems that way to me.
Yesterday, West Virginia Solicitor General Michael Williams sent a letter to the Supreme Court clerk, which has been circulated to the justices. It clarifies B.P.J.’s recent performance at the 2026 State Track and Field Championships: as a sophomore, B.P.J. won first place in the Class AAA girls’ shot put — winning by over 5% — and finished fourth in discus. This stands in stark contrast to the “not even any good at sports” narrative advanced during oral arguments back in January.
As a rising sophomore with two more years of high school eligibility, B.P.J. is positioned to continue improving and dominating in strength-based events where male puberty advantages (even mitigated by blockers) persist in metrics like muscle mass, bone density and power output.
And let’s clarify something else here about how exceptional these results are. (Full credit to HeCheated.org here. Which you should follow on X, if you do such things.)
In the U.S., only 1.6% of female athletes have achieved 38’ in the shot put; 25% of boys; and 83% of trans-identified boys competing in the girls’ category. Please also keep in mind, that in the girls’ event the weight of the shot is lighter. For boys, the shot is 12 pounds and for girls’ it is 8.8 pounds. So B.P.J. has the strength of a boy, throwing the lighter girls’ shot, and he achieves a distance that ranks in the top 1/4 of all boys. And the top 2% of all girls.
But it’s all just for fun, y’all!
The letter from the Solicitor General highlights how B.P.J'.’s athletic success flies in the face of the ACLU’s arguments.
Adding further complexity (not in the letter), B.P.J. has faced accusations from former teammates of sexual harassment in the girls’ locker room, including allegedly making explicit and aggressive comments to female athletes such as “I’m going to stick my d*ck in your p*ssy, and your a*s too.”
Let’s drop the aw shucks I’m just a girl act, please.
It’s ironic that B.P.J.’s own lawyers have presented their client as minimally competitive — a “vulnerable girl” just wanting to have fun with friends — while B.P.J. has proven fiercely competitive on the field.
Rather than dialing back effort to bolster the legal case and avoid making the ACLU look inconsistent, he went all out, winning the state title in shot put by a notable margin (5.59%).
This boy smoked the female competition.
If he’s willing to lie about his sex, why wouldn’t he lie about just wanting to play for fun? In reality, B.P.J. is so damn competitive, he wouldn’t even throw state to win his Supreme Court case.
In sports, competition reveals truths that legal arguments sometimes obscure — and here, the results speak louder than the briefs, which seem riddled with lies for argument’s sake. The biggest and most fundamental lie being that this boy is a girl because he blocked his puberty.
That is the plan. It's not happening, it doesn't affect anybody, they just want to have fun with their friends, they don't even win.... until there are a lot of them everywhere, they're winning, and they're too involved for things to be easily set right.
Nothing says “I’m a real girl” like threatening to rape people. 🙄