"Gender affirming care" doctor refused to publish a study that failed to show puberty blockers worked to alleviate gender dysphoria and emotional distress in young people.
Thank you, Jen. Great work. Restacking. As J.K. Rowling put it, by “weaponized,” Olson-Kennedy must mean, “We must not publish a study that says we’re harming children because people who say we’re harming children will use the study as evidence that we’re harming children, which might make it difficult for us to continue harming children.”
The entire field is based on fallacies. First, none of their childhood theories of "since earliest memory, wrong body" connect at all with long-accepted Piaget stages of child development. A retired K teacher (along with a couple of years teaching early grade science and remedial math at all levels), I recently re-memorized the 4 stages: sensory-motor (birth - 3), pre-operational (3-6), concrete operational (6-10) formal operational (11-14). Olson-Kennedy must testify before congress and be questioned exactly on whether she knows this. Every doctor should have this at their fingertips. They claim "since earliest memory" but typically quote 6 year olds saying a fantasy about wanting to be the opposite sex. Earliest memory is usually age 3-4 and the memories are hazy images, which we and our families overlay with verbal narrative. When a teen in formal operational stage is guided to crossdress and use objects (make-up, shoes, haircut, clothing) as a costume of the opposite sex, this sends the patient down to concrete operational stage, where objects are necessary to "prove" any phenomena. They are holding back study results because the likes of Dr. Richard/Rachel Levine will "be upset" that their personal choices of body modification are founded on mist and sand.
Nike is funding sports performance research associated with blocking puberty in kids as young as 12 years old. See this article: https://www.thefemalecategory.com/p/nike-and-wu-tsai-alliance-dont-want
The study is active according to one of the researchers listed on the project.
yes i saw your note on this. will write something...
Thank you, Jen. Great work. Restacking. As J.K. Rowling put it, by “weaponized,” Olson-Kennedy must mean, “We must not publish a study that says we’re harming children because people who say we’re harming children will use the study as evidence that we’re harming children, which might make it difficult for us to continue harming children.”
The entire field is based on fallacies. First, none of their childhood theories of "since earliest memory, wrong body" connect at all with long-accepted Piaget stages of child development. A retired K teacher (along with a couple of years teaching early grade science and remedial math at all levels), I recently re-memorized the 4 stages: sensory-motor (birth - 3), pre-operational (3-6), concrete operational (6-10) formal operational (11-14). Olson-Kennedy must testify before congress and be questioned exactly on whether she knows this. Every doctor should have this at their fingertips. They claim "since earliest memory" but typically quote 6 year olds saying a fantasy about wanting to be the opposite sex. Earliest memory is usually age 3-4 and the memories are hazy images, which we and our families overlay with verbal narrative. When a teen in formal operational stage is guided to crossdress and use objects (make-up, shoes, haircut, clothing) as a costume of the opposite sex, this sends the patient down to concrete operational stage, where objects are necessary to "prove" any phenomena. They are holding back study results because the likes of Dr. Richard/Rachel Levine will "be upset" that their personal choices of body modification are founded on mist and sand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqUNy1Vcxa0&t=37s