I love what you’re doing re No XY in XX, Jennifer, but worry about what you’re doing re. COVID.
***
Lockdowns weren’t anti-scientific, they were based on an evolving precautionary approach in the face of a novel pandemic.
The premature “let it rip” approach was a risky one, and the bet didn’t pay off for kids (or for adults, frankly). A more complete lockdown to break the transmission chain completely would have been the best option in hindsight (as many like my family advocated for).
The most comprehensive yet study of Post-COVID-19 Conditions (PCC, aka Long COVID in the vernacular) demonstrates clear physical harm to children associated with even mild COViD infections, and increasing harm with more severe infections and with reinfections.
The lockdown had & have deleterious effects, for certain, and a more comprehensive lockdown would have had even more significant such impacts.
But at least such affected children have a fair shot at catching up if governments take adequate policy measures to support them (the first step being acknowledging this reality); many of their infected (and reinfected) peers may not get that chance due to permanent physical and cognitive declines.
all mainstream physicians, including political leftwing loon relatives of mine now fully acknowledge that covid is harmless to kids. I listened quietly while my cousin lied and said 'we just didn't know at the time...' but the reality is that we fully knew. Numerous studies had already been done on covid, and it was clear that kids were in no danger, and that it did not spread outside, nor on playground equipment. But the same people saying it was based on " evolving precautionary approach in the face of a novel pandemic" actually ridiculed those of us that took the time to research it--and lied repeatedly about the scientific findings we disclosed. Obviously, she should forge ahead with any projects on the Milgram/Asche horror show known as 'covid'.
Just saw a clip of the young girl speaking to her school board in CA. She shouldn’t have to do that, she deserves to be a teen enjoying her life.
Brave
PLEASEPLEASEPLEASE!!!
MAKE THIS STOP...
DO NOT COMPETE IF THERE IS A FAKE GIRL ON EITHER TEAM!
**Parents: these biological girls are getting hurt on the field... or wherever they are competing... Both physically and psychologically!
P L E A S E don't allow your girls...you're real "born-as-girls" girls compete with the penis-prancers!
Grr…All this unfairness to female athletes going on while Nike funds sports research on blocking puberty in kids! Go XX-XY Athletics!
Order placed. Keep on truckin' Jen.
The XX XY clothing is super high quality and looks great! It's a great way to support the brand and the mission.
Utter insanity.
Keep it up.
Agreed, Jenn.
BOYcott!
Now and until it ends.
I love what you’re doing re No XY in XX, Jennifer, but worry about what you’re doing re. COVID.
***
Lockdowns weren’t anti-scientific, they were based on an evolving precautionary approach in the face of a novel pandemic.
The premature “let it rip” approach was a risky one, and the bet didn’t pay off for kids (or for adults, frankly). A more complete lockdown to break the transmission chain completely would have been the best option in hindsight (as many like my family advocated for).
The most comprehensive yet study of Post-COVID-19 Conditions (PCC, aka Long COVID in the vernacular) demonstrates clear physical harm to children associated with even mild COViD infections, and increasing harm with more severe infections and with reinfections.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00657-x
The lockdown had & have deleterious effects, for certain, and a more comprehensive lockdown would have had even more significant such impacts.
But at least such affected children have a fair shot at catching up if governments take adequate policy measures to support them (the first step being acknowledging this reality); many of their infected (and reinfected) peers may not get that chance due to permanent physical and cognitive declines.
I might suggest reading this well-researched book by David Zweig. Just out. An excerpt in The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2025/04/school-closures-predictable-disaster/682431/
Jenn-
With all due respect to this submission, please charge ahead on the C19 project. The military operation needs to be revealed.
Just ask Mike Pompeo.
I'm charging.
all mainstream physicians, including political leftwing loon relatives of mine now fully acknowledge that covid is harmless to kids. I listened quietly while my cousin lied and said 'we just didn't know at the time...' but the reality is that we fully knew. Numerous studies had already been done on covid, and it was clear that kids were in no danger, and that it did not spread outside, nor on playground equipment. But the same people saying it was based on " evolving precautionary approach in the face of a novel pandemic" actually ridiculed those of us that took the time to research it--and lied repeatedly about the scientific findings we disclosed. Obviously, she should forge ahead with any projects on the Milgram/Asche horror show known as 'covid'.
Women are women’s greatest enemies.
Good thing that it hardly ever mostly never it’s such a few happens.
That 80% statistic would make a good slogan (although it's sad the number is so low).
That’s a relief. I was worried some girl would beat them.
How is that possibly fair?!
Commiefornia !!!
Can you post a single source that substantiates your claim that the top girls high jumpers in CT, CA, and OR are xy males?
I’ve seen this claim in numerous places, with zero sources cited to date.